Ibrahim Elbakry NM, Hemeda MS, Mostafa Mohamed Ahmed A, Adel Zaky H, Gamil AN, Arafat Abd Elmoaty AE, M Khafagi M, Mohamed Alkabeer A, Abd Elaziz Alsaid A, A Elhagary A, Mohammed Aboassy W, Nabil Gamil Mohammed A. Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with insulin resistance, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and dyslipidemia in obese children with metabolic syndrome. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 121926 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i3.121926]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
My overall experience with the World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics has been highly positive. The journal provides a valuable international platform for publishing clinically relevant and scientifically meaningful research in pediatrics. It demonstrates a strong commitment to scientific quality, professional editorial standards, and constructive peer review. The editorial and review process is well organized, and the comments provided are helpful in improving the scientific quality, clarity, and presentation of submitted manuscripts. The journal’s broad clinical scope and open-access model also contribute significantly to the visibility and accessibility of pediatric research. Overall, I highly appreciate the journal’s professionalism and academic contribution, and I would confidently recommend it to researchers and clinicians working in the field of pediatrics.